William Lashner - Official Website


William Lashner Photo © Sigrid Estrada

AuthorTracker

Want to receive notice of books, events, promotions, and news of William Lashner? Sign up now!

Enter your e-mail address below.


 HarperCollins Privacy Policy

HTML Text Only



William Lashner's PI-Writing Blog

Why Important Films Always Suck

Sunday, July 8, 2012


We talk about stories having a good message.  Actors want to act in them because of the politics, writers bask in the glow of the acclaim for taking on big issues.  It’s not just an action picture, it’s a call for responsibility in buying diamonds from Africa.  It’s not just a raunchy sex comedy, it’s a story about the importance of family and personal responsibility. But isn't all that lily-gilding a perversion of what a story is?  Doesn't a story's beginning, middle, and resolution provide all the meaning it needs?  There is a corpse.  The questions is who did the killing.  Isn't finding the killer answer enough?  The very existence of the story provides its meaning.  Adding some soppy message on top of that is just a cynical way of selling the story to an audience intoxicated with its own sincerity.  In that way stories are better than we are; they never need occupy themselves in a search for their meaning.

A person without meaning is lost and pathetic.  A story without meaning is Hamlet.

1 Comments:

Blogger Tom Reid said...

I think that good message for film it's not enough, all pieces of picture is need to be complete (image, sound, operator work, and good and structure scenario and actors), you can find more about writing scenario in this useful resource

November 24, 2016 at 8:06 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Latest Post